lawyer

Antitrust laws are designed to prohibit unfair business practices and to promote competition in the marketplace. Under antitrust laws, there are a number of practices that are considered illegal. These include price fixing. creating an illegal monopoly, geographic market allocation and bid rigging. Companies found guilty of violating antitrust laws can face stiff fines and company officials could face jail time for their part in breaking antitrust regulations.

Send your antitrust claim to a Lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation.

Antitrust laws were designed to protect economic freedom and promote competition in the marketplace. As such, companies that are found to behave in an anti-competitive manner may be guilty of antitrust. Actions that may constitute antitrust behavior include creating an illegal monopoly, illegally reducing competition, bid rigging, group boycotts, geographic market allocation and price fixing. Antitrust laws apply to virtually every sector of industry, including manufacturing, transportation, distribution and marketing.

There are three major federal antitrust laws: The Sherman Antitrust Act (1890), The Clayton Act (1914) and the Federal Trade Commission Act (1914).

The Sherman Antitrust Act prohibits all contracts, combinations and conspiracies that unreasonably restrict interstate and foreign trade. This includes price fixing, bid rigging and customer allocation. Furthermore, under the Sherman Act, it is a crime to monopolize any part of interstate commerce. Provisions in the Sherman Act are primarily enforced by the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department.

The Clayton Act prohibits mergers or acquisitions that are likely to restrict competition and therefore increase prices to consumers. The Clayton Act is enforced by both the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission.

The Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits unfair methods of competition in interstate commerce.

Possibly the most well-known of the antitrust behaviors are price fixing and the illegal monopoly.

Price fixing occurs when competing sellers agree on what prices to charge for their goods or services. This includes agreeing not to sell a product or service below a certain price.

Monopolies occur when one company or firm gains control of the market by suppressing competition through illegal conduct.

Bid rigging occurs when firms agree to bid on a good or service in such a way that a designated firm will submit the winning bid. Essentially, the firms agree beforehand which company will win the bid and then bid in such a way as to ensure that this happens.

Customer allocation involves competitors agreeing to split up customers—for example, by geographic area—to reduce or eliminate competition.

Companies that violate antitrust laws cause great harm to consumers by depriving them of the benefits of competition, including lower costs of products and services. Cases alleging antitrust behavior have been tried against soft drink companies, vitamin companies, trash haulers and software companies. Companies found to have violated antitrust laws may face jail time and large fines. Furthermore, individuals who claim damages as a result of antitrust behavior can bring a lawsuit against the company found to have acted in a non-competitive manner.

• Nurses Get Payout in Antitrust Case Washington, DC: Nurses' wages usually top the list of expenses at hospitals—and attorney Dan Small, from the prestigious and well-known law firm of Cohen, Millstein, Sellers & Toll, says he is not surprised to see hospitals engage in an antitrust-type conspiracy to control costs.
• Google Under Scrutiny by European Commission for Alleged Antitrust Activity BRUSSELS: Google, the giant internet search engine, has come under the scrutiny of the European Commission (EC), which has just announced an antitrust investigation amidst allegations Google has abused its dominance in the global online search arena.
• BP Employees Sue Over Losses New York, NY: Members of the BP Plc employee savings plan are suing over financial losses resulting from the company's plummeting share price in the wake of the BP oil spill disaster.